Antenatal and Postnatal Group Care during the First 1000 days

Midwives have a critical role in providing and improving maternal and child health. At the same time they face increasing challenges connected to global workforce shortages and compromised autonomy; negatively impacting services for pregnant women, other gender diverse people, their families and their newborns. Poor quality of maternal and newborn health services (content and delivery) have been identified as a root factor in avoidable maternal and new-born mortality and morbidity and in preventing families from reaching their full health potential. Besides, the needs of pregnant women and newborns do not stop after birth. However, changing the way healthcare is provided requires not only a healthy and sustainable workforce but also vision of what might be possible as well as guidance through the implementation process.
The GC_1000 Project was a four-year, European Union funded project that focused on the implementation of ante- postnatal Group Care, involving the Netherlands and seven other countries around the world. In this article, midwives Suze Jans and Marlies Rijnders discuss the project’s findings and useful outputs to improve maternal and newborn health.
New model of care
Ante- and postnatal Group Care is a healthcare model which provides medical care as well as interactive learning and an opportunity for participants to share their joys and concerns in a supportive environment. This creates a social support network beyond the realms of health care. Group Care is generally provided by two facilitators, one of whom must be a qualified health care provider such as a midwife.
The Group Care Model has demonstrated significant positive effects on outcomes and benefits for both pregnant women, newborns and families. What’s more, the model has been shown to increase work satisfaction and it has the potential to strengthen the role of the midwife.
Randomised studies have shown a trend towards a decrease in preterm births for those receiving Group Care compared to traditional care (1,2,3). Some studies also found reduced disparities in preterm birth rates for Black women, relative to White and Hispanic women (1,2,3). Studies also suggest that marginalised and/or under-served groups can benefit more from Group Care (3,4). There is some evidence suggesting a reduced occurrence of low birthweight in babies born to women who participated in antenatal Group Care (5). Group Care participants tend to have a reduced likelihood of caesarean section births and a lower likelihood of newborns being admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Postnatal Group Care has shown to increase child immunisation rates and improve attendance and weight-related outcomes in children across all demographics (6,7,8). Service providers describe Group Care as a model which has an enhanced capacity to meet families’ needs.
The Group Care_1000 project
Despite the existing and growing global evidence, implementation of Group Care is generally small-scale and has not yet penetrated global health systems. The Group Care for the First 1000 Days project (GC_1000), aimed to bridge this gap by implementing ante- and postnatal Group Care in health systems in seven countries spread around the world and transforming lessons learned during the project into supportive tools for global implementation. The project focused on four action areas: Understanding local contexts and health systems, capacity-building, the process and it’s impact, co-creation of tools.
The results of the GC_1000 project showed the complexities of adopting and adapting Group Care in diverse settings and emphasised the critical role of committed personnel such as midwives, leadership, community engagement, cultural sensitivity and the support of policymakers and all organisational staff levels for the successful implementation of ante- and postnatal Group Care.
Why is Group Care important for midwives
Lessons learned from the GC_1000 project clearly show that the experiences of midwives and other health care professionals involved, are essential to the implementation of Group Care. It profoundly changes the midwives’ role from that of a traditional didactic one, to one that is facilitating and uses the strength and knowledge already present in the group. It is not always easy to lose the familiar role of expert in all things concerning pregnancy and birth. It requires training and practice and learning to trust that the group will come up with the answers. The model empowers pregnant women and new parents to look after themselves as well as each other, thereby encouraging the flattening of traditional medical and hierarchical structures.
Group Care sessions allow midwives and other maternity care providers to spend more time with pregnant women and parents, to get to know them better and enabling stronger relationships by listening to their stories and some of the challenges they may face. Trust and continuity of care(-r) is created by stable facilitators and group members, ensuring that information shared stays within the group, as well as ensuring that care is midwife-led. Because the model requires two facilitators, it encourages midwives to work together and collaborate with other professionals who provide care to young families. Midwives have reported the Group Care experience to be a liberating experience and the art of listening and asking questions in order to empower pregnant women and families, ultimately results in greater work satisfaction for midwives.
Tools
The tools developed in the project are based on the project results and freely available on the GC_1000 website:
- A policy brief to inform policymakers and stakeholders
- A strategic implementation Toolkit for a global audience
- Country-specific blueprints
- Virtual learning modules
- Leaflets and video’s explaining the model
To share continuing insights about ante- and postnatal Group Care, a Community of Practice (CoP) is available to connect those with interest in Group Care. This free online community, housed within the World Health Organization’s IBP Network, supports all CoP members to share resources, strategies, and innovations so that collectively we can make Group Care a reality throughout the world.
We encourage you to utilise these resources to inform yourself about Group Care. By joining the CoP, you will become part of a global community working towards the implementation of Group Care and which will support you in its planning, implementation, and scale-up.
Changing maternity care for the benefit of women and families worldwide, is both exciting and challenging but will also improve the work satisfaction of midwives and help strengthen their role.
References
- Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H, Rising SS. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):330-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):937. PMID: 17666608; PMCID: PMC2276878.
- Picklesimer AH, Billings D, Hale N, Blackhurst D, Covington-Kolb S. The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):415.e1-7.
- Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2. PMID: 28962601; PMCID: PMC5622470.
- Liu R, Chao M, Jostad-Laswell A. Does CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care affect the birth experience of underserved women? A mixed methods analysis. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2016;19: 415-422.
- Carter EB, Temming LA, Akin J., Fowler S, Macones GA, Colditz GA, Tuuli MG. Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol. 2016 September ; 128(3): 551–561. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
- Irigoyen M.M., Lein S.M., Paoletti A.M., DeLago C.W., Timeliness of Immunizations in CenteringParenting ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS 2021;21:948−954
- Fennick AM, Leventhal, J.M., Gilliam, W., Rosenthal, M.S. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Well-Child Care: Improved Attendance and Vaccination Timeliness.Clin Pediatr (Phila).2020. Jun;59(7):686-691. doi: 10.1177/0009922820908582.
- Gaskin E, Yorga KW, Berman R, Allison M, Sheeder J. Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review. Matern Child Health J. 2021 Oct;25(10):1526-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03170-y. Epub 2021 May 7. PMID: 33961210.
This story was submitted by Dr. Suze Jans, RM and Dr. Marlies Rijnders, RM, researchers at TNO, Child health on behalf of the GC_1000 Consortium.
From January 2020 through to June 2024, the GC_1000 project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 848147).